Key Takeaways
- 1The performance gap between top models is a rounding error. Stop obsessing.
- 2Pick GPT-4o or Claude 3.5 Sonnet today. Switching later takes 10 minutes of code.
- 3Context windows are a trap. Dumping a 500-page unorganized wiki into an LLM guarantees hallucinations.
- 4Kill the custom chat wrappers. Pipe AI directly into Slack, Airtable, or your ERP.
- 5You don't have an AI problem. You have a broken, undocumented process problem.
You are burning cash debating whether to use OpenAI or Anthropic while your actual operations remain a dumpster fire. You don't need another benchmark report. You need to map out your broken processes.
Founders across LatAm are obsessing over GPT-4o's multimodality and Claude 3.5 Sonnet's context limits. Let's get real. The model you pick does not move the needle.
The brutal truth about the model wars
Comparing GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet for standard business tasks is pure procrastination. Both can parse customs PDFs. Both can draft client updates. Both write Python faster than a junior developer.
Pick one API key today and start coding. If you hit a wall, switching models takes exactly ten minutes. The API structures are practically identical.
The context window trap
Do not dump a 500-page unorganized wiki into a prompt just because Gemini 1.5 Pro has a 2-million token window. You will pay a premium to generate hallucinated garbage. Clean your data before you call the API.
Real use cases, real money
Look at MercadoLibre. They didn't wait for a flawless AI model. They used standard LLM calls to route thousands of support tickets. They saved thousands of manual hours on day one.
A mid-sized logistics company in Bogota was drowning in customs broker emails. We wired Claude 3.5 Sonnet directly to their inbox via a single API.
The model extracts shipping manifest data and drops it straight into their SAP system. Zero human touch. That one API call saves them $4,000 every single month in manual data entry.
You don't have an AI problem. You have an undocumented process problem.
Kill your custom chat wrappers
Paying an agency to build a custom chat interface over GPT-4o is a massive mistake. You are just recreating ChatGPT, but making it worse.
Stop forcing employees to open another tab. Pipe the data directly into the tools they already use: Slack, Airtable, or Salesforce. Make the AI invisible.
- GPT-4o: Use it for fast, cheap reasoning or real-time voice applications.
- Claude 3.5 Sonnet: The undisputed king of writing production code and generating text that doesn't sound like a robot.
- Gemini 1.5 Pro: Ignore it unless you specifically need to process a two-hour video or an entire massive dataset in a single prompt.
How to stop thinking and start doing
- Map the process: Write down every single click, copy-paste, and decision your team makes to complete one boring task.
- Break it down: If that process takes more than ten steps, isolate the smallest, dumbest bottleneck.
- Delegate to AI: Hand that specific micro-task to an LLM via API. Pipe the output straight back into your database.
Stop chasing shiny model updates on Twitter. Focus strictly on your infrastructure. Good plumbing with an average model destroys a genius model with terrible plumbing.
Ready to fix your operational plumbing?
Stop debating models and start automating. We wire AI directly into the operations of LatAm businesses so you can stop paying for manual data entry.
Book a callFrequently Asked Questions
Which AI model is best for basic data extraction?
Both GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet handle this perfectly. Pick the one you already have an API key for and get to work.
Should we host our own open-source models?
Absolutely not. Unless you have a massive engineering team and strict compliance needs, you are just burning cash on cloud compute.
Kyto
AI & Automation Firm
We design and build AI automations and business operating systems. Agency results + Academy sovereignty.

